Overview

The Unit Plan Key Assessment requires teacher candidates to plan and develop a set of lessons around a particular topic (a unit, approximately 500 minutes of instruction), support materials, and assessments. This unit of instruction must be developed in consultation with the mentor teacher and taught during the internÕs full time teaching portion of the phase 2 internship. 

An overall grade of “Proficient” is required to progress from Phase 1.

Purpose

Teaching involves more than just developing individual, stand-alone lessons.  A teacher must be able to develop coherent lessons organized around a central theme to support student understanding of concepts, procedures, and relationships.  To accomplish this task, a teacher must be able to develop lessons that are interconnected across extended periods of time.  The Unit Plan Key Assessment provides teacher candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their ability to plan a coherent unit of instruction.

Connections to Standards

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2012 Elements

Unit Plan Component

2a) Use problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, make sense of a wide variety of problems and persevere in solving them, apply and adapt a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and formulate and test conjectures in order to frame generalizations.

       Individual Lesson Plans

2b) Reason abstractly, reflectively, and quantitatively with attention to units, constructing viable arguments and proofs, and critiquing the reasoning of others; represent and model generalizations using mathematics; recognize structure and express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning; use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics; and utilize appropriate mathematical vocabulary and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to others.

       Individual Lesson Plans

2d) Organize mathematical thinking and use the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences.

       Individual Lesson Plans

2e) Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts.

       Unit Plan Description Alignment Chart

       Individual Lesson Plans

2f) Model how the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing.

       Individual Lesson Plans

3a) Apply knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains.

       Alignment Chart

3b) Analyze and consider research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences.

       Individual Lesson Plans

3c) Plan lessons and units that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction for diverse populations, and mathematics-specific and instructional technologies in building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural proficiency.

       Unit Plan Description

       Individual Lesson Plans

3d) Provide students with opportunities to communicate about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace.

       Individual Lesson Plans

3e) Implement techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies.

       Individual Lesson Plans

3f) Plan, select, implement, interpret, and use formative and summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students.

       Assessment Plan

3g) Monitor studentsÕ progress, make instructional decisions, and measure studentsÕ mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative assessments.

       Assessment Plan

4a) Exhibit knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior and demonstrate a positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning.

       Individual Lesson Plans

       Assessment Plan

4b) Plan and create developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences.

       Individual Lesson Plans

4c) Incorporate knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and include culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students.

       Individual Lesson Plans

4d) Demonstrate equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students.

       Individual Lesson Plans

4e) Apply mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry software, computer algebra systems, and statistical packages); and make sound decisions about when such tools enhance teaching and learning, recognizing both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools.

       Individual Lesson Plans

5a) Verify that secondary students demonstrate conceptual understanding; procedural fluency; the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems; logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning; productive disposition toward mathematics; and the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains.

       Assessment Plan

5b) Engage students in developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active engagement and include mathematics-specific technology in building new knowledge.

       Individual Lesson Plans

5c) Collect, organize, analyze, and reflect on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determine the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction.

       Assessment Plan

6c) Utilize resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections.

       Individual Lesson Plans

 

Requirements

The curriculum project needs to include the following components:

I. Cover Page

      Includes driving question or title, intended grade level(s), content area, your name (s) and date.

II. Description of Unit

1.   Overall Rationale

      A written statement (about 1 page) in which you summarize your philosophy of mathematics teaching and how it influences the unit you are developing.

      A description of an essential or driving question and how it serves as the focus of the unit.

2.   Curriculum Alignment Chart (Concept Map or Outline)

      A table/chart(or other appropriate mechanism) showing the connection among Lessons, Content standard(s), and Summative Assessment Item(s).  

III. Assessment Plan

      A pre-assessment to determine the baseline knowledge of students. This assessment should be the same as the summative assessment.

      A formative assessment plan to identify how students are progressing toward lesson/unit objectives during the unit (e.g., observation, homework, classwork)

      A summative assessment to determine the impact of the unit on student learning.

v Assessment items need to be aligned to the unitÕs curriculum goals. 

v Assessment items must include higher order thinking (e.g., Levels 4-6 of BloomÕs).

IV. Daily Lesson Plans

      Lesson plans for 500 minutes of instruction should be fully developed and "classroom-ready."  The lesson plans must use the official UMBC Secondary Program Mathematics Lesson Plan template.  

      Support Materials (such as copies of handouts, worksheets, journal pages, overheads, etc.) should be embedded in the lesson plans to which they are connected.

      Physical and/or technology tools are required in each lesson. Both physical and technological tools are required at some point in the unit. A rationale for each tool should be included in the lesson plan reflection component of the lesson plan template.

      By the end of the unit, all eight standards of mathematical practice must be addressed at least once. The lesson plan should make explicit how students will be engaged in the practices.

      Identify resources from professional organizations explicitly (e.g., NCTM, MAA, MSRD). At least one resource from a professional organization is required.

      Identify relevant research addressed in the lesson plan reflection component of the lesson plan template (e.g., UDL, multiple intelligences).

      Although direct instruction and the ÒI Do-We Do-You DoÓ method may be appropriate occasionally, such methods should not be the foundation of your unit because they generally do not deeply engage students in the mathematical practice standards. Your lesson plans should demonstrate your ability to vary your instructional role (e.g., coach, facilitator).

      Include complete bibliographical information on all sources

V. Calendar

      Include a calendar with dates for activities, investigations and artifact production. Since you are not teaching the unit this term, the dates will probably be hypothetical, but the purpose of this requirement is to convert your brainstormed project into an ordered timeline, taking into account weekends, holidays, etc.

Process

The curriculum project is constructed throughout the fall semester in collaboration with your mentor teacher.  You are required to have your mentor review and Òsign offÓ during multiple checkpoints of the project construction.  These checkpoints include:

1.     Identification of content standards to be addressed.  The content should address standards that you will be teaching during phase 2 (generally during Feb and/or March). 

2.     Development of appropriate Pre/Post assessments

3.     Outline of curriculum unit lessons

4.     Development of one completed lesson plan

The curriculum project is due during finals week of the fall semester. 

 

Rubric link

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2012 Indicator

1

2

3

4

The Unit as a Whole

2e.1) Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical ideas.

Few mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

Some mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

Sufficient mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

In-Depth mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

2e.2) Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections across various content areas and real-world contexts.

Few mathematical connections are made across various content areas and real-world contexts.

Some mathematical connections are made across various content areas and real-world contexts.

Sufficient mathematical connections are made across various content areas and real-world contexts.

In-Depth mathematical connections are made across various content areas and real-world contexts.

3c.1) Plan units that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction for diverse populations.

The unit contains little to no strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

The unit contains some strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

The unit contains sufficient strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

The unit contains an abundance of strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

3c.2) Plan units that incorporate mathematics-specific and instructional technologies in building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural proficiency.

The unit incorporates little to no mathematics-specific and instructional technologies, or the technologies are not targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

The unit incorporates some mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

The unit incorporates sufficient mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

The unit incorporates an abundance of mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

Length of Unit

The unit plans for significantly more or less than 500 minutes of instruction, timing estimates for individual lessons are not consistently included, or timing estimates are not reasonable.

The unit plans for approximately 500 minutes of instruction, but timing estimates are sometimes over- or under-estimated.

The unit plans for approximately 500 minutes of instruction, and timing estimates are reasonable.

The unit plans for approximately 500 minutes of instruction, and timing estimates are reasonable, and timing adjustments for under- and over-achieving students are included.

Curriculum Alignment Chart

 

 

 

 

2e.3) Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical ideas.

Few mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

Some mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

Sufficient mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

In-Depth mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas.

3a) Apply knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains.

Application of knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains is not evident.

Application of knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains is somewhat evident.

Application of knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains is sufficiently evident.

Application of knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains is abundantly evident.

Assessment Plan

3f.1) Plan, select, implement, interpret, and use formative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is not evident.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is somewhat evident.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is sufficiently evident.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is abundantly evident.

3f.2) Plan, select, implement, interpret, and use summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is not evident.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is somewhat evident.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is sufficiently evident.

The planning, selecting, implementing, interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is abundantly evident.

3g) Monitor studentsÕ progress, make instructional decisions, and measure studentsÕ mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative assessments.

The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative assessments is not evident.

The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative assessments is somewhat evident.

The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative assessments is sufficiently evident.

The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative assessments is abundantly evident.

5a.1) The teacher verifies that secondary students demonstrate conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

Verification of both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency is not evident.

Verification of both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency is somewhat evident.

Verification of both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency is sufficiently evident.

Verification of both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency is abundantly evident.

5a.2) The teacher verifies that secondary students demonstrate the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems.

Verification of the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems is not evident.

Verification of the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems is somewhat evident.

Verification of the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems is sufficiently evident.

Verification of have the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems is abundantly evident.

5a.3) The teacher verifies that secondary students demonstrate logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning.

Verification of logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning is not evident.

Verification of logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning is somewhat evident.

Verification of logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning is sufficiently evident.

Verification of logical reasoning and continuous reflection on that reasoning is abundantly evident.

5a.4) The teacher verifies that secondary students apply mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains.

Verification that secondary students apply mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is not evident.

Verification that secondary students apply mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is somewhat evident.

Verification that secondary students apply mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is sufficiently evident.

Verification that secondary students apply mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is abundantly evident.

5c) Collect, organize, analyze, and reflect on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determine the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction.

Plan for collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is not evident.

Plan for collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is somewhat evident.

Plan for collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is sufficiently evident.

Plan for collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is abundantly evident.

Daily Lesson Plans

Format of Lesson Plans

The lessons are presented in the Secondary Program Lesson Plan Template, but a significant amount of information in the template is missing or unclear.

The lessons are presented in the Secondary Program Lesson Plan Template, but some information in the template is missing or unclear.

The lessons are presented in the Secondary Program Lesson Plan Template, and all information in the template is included.

The lessons are presented in the Secondary Program Lesson Plan Template, all information in the template is included, and all information is clear, sufficiently detailed yet succinct, and well-organized.

2a) Use problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, make sense of a wide variety of problems and persevere in solving them, apply and adapt a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and formulate and test conjectures in order to frame generalizations.

Lesson plans do not clearly engage students in problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to frame generalizations.

Lesson plans inconsistently engage students in problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to frame generalizations.

Lesson plans consistently engage students in problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to frame generalizations.

Problem solving for develop conceptual understanding, for making sense of a wide variety of problems and persevering in solving them, for applying and adapting a variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and for formulating and testing conjectures to frame generalizations is an integral part of all lesson plans.

2b.1) The teacher engages learners in abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units.

Engagement of learners in abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is not evident.

Engagement of learners in abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is somewhat evident.

Engagement of learners in abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is sufficiently evident.

Engagement of learners in abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is abundantly evident.

2b.2) The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the reasoning of others.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the reasoning of others are not evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the reasoning of others are somewhat evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the reasoning of others are sufficiently evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the reasoning of others are abundantly evident.

2b.3) The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics, to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics, to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning are not evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics, to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning are somewhat evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics, to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning are sufficiently evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics, to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning are abundantly evident.

2b.4) The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics are not evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics are somewhat evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics are sufficiently evident.

Plans to facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics are abundantly evident.

2d) Organize mathematical thinking and use the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences.

The organization of mathematical thinking and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences is not evident.

The organization of mathematical thinking and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences is somewhat evident.

The organization of mathematical thinking and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences is sufficiently evident.

The organization of mathematical thinking and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences is abundantly evident.

2e) Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts.

The demonstration of the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognition and application of mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is not evident.

The demonstration of the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognition and application of mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is somewhat evident.

The demonstration of the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognition and application of mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is sufficiently evident.

The demonstration of the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another and recognition and application of mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is abundantly evident.

2f) Model how the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing.

Modeling how the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing is not evident.

Modeling how the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing is somewhat evident.

Modeling how the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing is sufficiently evident.

Modeling how the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing is abundantly evident.

3b) Analyze and consider research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences.

The application of research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the unit is not evident.

The application of research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the unit is somewhat evident.

The application of research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the unit is sufficiently evident.

The application of research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the unit is abundantly evident.

3c.3) Plan lessons that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction for diverse populations.

Individual lessons contain little to no strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

Individual lessons contain some strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

Individual lessons contain sufficient strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

Individual lessons contain an abundance of strategy variation and differentiated instruction.

3c.4) Plan lessons that incorporate mathematics-specific and instructional technologies in building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural proficiency.

Individual lessons incorporate little to no mathematics-specific and instructional technologies, or the technologies are not targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

Individual lessons incorporate some mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

Individual lessons incorporate sufficient mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

Individual lessons incorporate an abundance of mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

3d) Provide students with opportunities to communicate about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace.

Opportunities for students to communicate about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace are not evident.

Opportunities for students to communicate about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace are somewhat evident.

Opportunities for students to communicate about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace are sufficiently evident.

Opportunities for students to communicate about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace are abundantly evident.

3e) Implement techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies.

Implementation of techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies is not evident.

Implementation of techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies is somewhat evident.

Implementation of techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies is sufficiently evident.

Implementation of techniques related to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning strategies is abundantly evident.

4a.1) Exhibit knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior.

Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior is not evident.

Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior is somewhat evident.

Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior is sufficiently evident.

Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior is abundantly evident.

4a.2) Demonstrate a positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning.

Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning is not evident.

Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning is somewhat evident.

Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning is sufficiently evident.

Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning is abundantly evident.

4b) Plan and create developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences.

The planning and creating of developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is not evident.

The planning and creating of developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is somewhat evident.

The planning and creating of developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is sufficiently evident.

The planning and creating of developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is abundantly evident.

4c) Incorporate knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and include culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students.

The incorporation of knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students is not evident.

The incorporation of knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students is somewhat evident.

The incorporation of knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students is sufficiently evident.

The incorporation of knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and engage students is abundantly evident.

4d) Demonstrate equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students.

The equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students is not evident.

The equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students is somewhat evident.

The equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students is sufficiently evident.

The equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students is abundantly evident.

4e.1) Apply mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry software, computer algebra systems, and statistical packages).

The application of mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is not evident.

The application of mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is somewhat evident.

The application of mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is sufficiently evident.

The application of mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is abundantly evident.

4e.2) Make sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry software, computer algebra systems, and statistical packages) enhance teaching and learning, recognizing both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools.

Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is not evident.

Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is somewhat evident.

Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is sufficiently evident.

Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is abundantly evident.

5b) Engage students in developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active engagement and include mathematics-specific technology in building new knowledge.

The engagement of students in developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new knowledge is not evident.

The engagement of students in developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new knowledge is somewhat evident.

The engagement of students in developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new knowledge is sufficiently evident.

The engagement of students in developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new knowledge is abundantly evident.

6c) Utilize resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections.

The use of resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections is not evident.

The use of resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections is somewhat evident.

The use of resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections is sufficiently evident.

The use of resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections is abundantly evident.

 

Connections to other assessments

1.     EDUC 412: Lesson plan adaptation and Reflection

2.     EDUC 426: Focus Lessons

3.     EDUC 426: Content Expertise

4.     EDUC 457: Effect on student learning – Teachingfolio

5.     EDUC 457: Enacted lessons – Teaching folio

 

Grader(s)

Course Instructor

Additional Resources

1.     Official Lesson plan template: https://www.box.com/s/rwmomb5gbcthminxtvv0

2.     Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: http://www.corestandards.org/Math

3.     Maryland Common Core Framework for Mathematics: http://mdk12.org/instruction/curriculum/mathematics/index.html

4.     Maryland State Department of Education Curriculum Management System Resources: https://msde.blackboard.com/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_219_1

5.     Tools for the Common Core for Mathematics: http://commoncoretools.me/tools/

6.     Multiple Intelligences: http://howardgardner.com/multiple-intelligences/

7.     Assessment: http://www.amle.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx

8.     Cooperative Learning: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/research/highlights/coop-learning/

9.     Fostering Higher Order Thinking in Authentic Contexts: http://www.leadered.com/rrr.html

10. Universal Design for Learning: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html

11. Task Rotation: http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/110129.aspx

12. Inquiry Based Learning: http://www.teachinquiry.com/index/Introduction.html

13. Scaffolding: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessons-six-strategies-rebecca-alber

14. Think-Pair-Share: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/interactive/tpshare.html

15. Frayer Models: http://www.readingeducator.com/strategies/frayer.htm

16. K-W-L: http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/printouts/chart-a-30226.html

17. Gallery Walks: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/gallerywalk/index.html

18. Chunking: http://www.skillstoolbox.com/career-and-education-skills/learning-skills/effective-learning-strategies/chunking/