Overview
The Enacted Lessons Key
Assessment is a set of three mathematics lessons intended to allow the teacher
candidate to provide evidence of his/her ability to communicate deep content
knowledge to secondary students. The assessment is based on the lesson plan,
reflection, and evidence of student learning.
Purpose
Effective mathematics
teachers integrate their understanding of mathematics with their pedagogical
skills to help all students develop deep mathematics understanding.
The integration of deep
content understanding with pedagogical knowledge and skills (ÒPedagogical
Content Knowledge,Ó Shulman, 1986) is needed to make connections between
concepts as well as between concepts and procedures (Hiebert
& Grouws, 2007; Skemp,
1976). It is also necessary for making connections with real world
phenomena. All teachers certified
in secondary mathematics should know, understand, teach, and be able to
communicate their mathematical knowledge.
The set of three mathematics enacted lessons provide evidence of the
candidateÕs ability to effectively help students learn mathematics content
deeply.
Connections to
Standards
(NCTM Mathematics Teacher Preparation Standards)
2a) Use problem solving to
develop conceptual understanding, make sense of a wide variety of problems
and persevere in solving them, apply and adapt a variety of strategies in
solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and other
contexts, and formulate and test conjectures in order to frame
generalizations. |
2b) Reason abstractly,
reflectively, and quantitatively with attention to units, constructing viable
arguments and proofs, and critiquing the reasoning of others; represent and
model generalizations using mathematics; recognize structure and express
regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning; use multiple
representations to model and describe mathematics; and utilize appropriate
mathematical vocabulary and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to
others. |
2c) Formulate, represent,
analyze, and interpret mathematical models derived from real-world contexts
or mathematical problems. |
2d) Organize mathematical
thinking and use the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both
orally and in writing to multiple audiences. |
2e) Demonstrate the
interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another
and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical ideas and
across various content areas and real-world contexts. |
2f) Model how the development of
mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects
with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing. |
3a) Apply knowledge of
curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to
student learning within and across mathematical domains. |
3b) Analyze and consider
research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical learning
experiences. |
3c) Plan lessons and units that
incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction for diverse
populations, and mathematics-specific and instructional technologies in
building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural proficiency. |
3d) Provide students with
opportunities to communicate about mathematics and make connections among
mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the workplace. |
3e) Implement techniques related
to student engagement and communication including selecting high quality
tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas,
identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of
questioning strategies. |
4a) Exhibit knowledge of
adolescent learning, development, and behavior and demonstrate a positive
disposition toward mathematical processes and learning. |
4b) Plan and create
developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning
opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students
are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and
experiences. |
4c) Incorporate knowledge of
individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists
within classrooms and include culturally relevant perspectives as a means to
motivate and engage students. |
4d) Demonstrate equitable and
ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students. |
4e) Apply mathematical content
and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments,
spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies
(e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry software, computer algebra
systems, and statistical packages); and make sound decisions about when such
tools enhance teaching and learning, recognizing both the insights to be
gained and possible limitations of such tools. |
5a) Verify that secondary
students demonstrate conceptual understanding; procedural fluency; the
ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems; logical reasoning and
continuous reflection on that reasoning; productive disposition toward
mathematics; and the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts
within major mathematical domains. |
5b) Engage students in
developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that
require active engagement and include mathematics-specific technology in
building new knowledge. |
6c) Utilize resources from
professional mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and
virtual resources/collections. |
7c) Develop knowledge, skills,
and professional behaviors across both middle and high school settings;
examine the nature of mathematics, how mathematics should be taught, and how
students learn mathematics; and observe and analyze a range of approaches to
mathematics teaching and learning, focusing on tasks, discourse, environment,
and assessment. |
Requirements
á The lesson plan must use the official UMBC Secondary Program Mathematics Lesson Plan template.
á Objectives and assessments for each lesson must target higher order thinking (BloomÕs taxonomy Levels 4-6).
á Support Materials (such as copies of handouts, worksheets, journal pages, overheads, etc.) must be included in or with each lesson plan.
á Physical and/or technology tools are required in each lesson. A rationale for each tool should be included in the lesson plan reflection component of the lesson plan template.
á Each lesson plan must make explicit how students will be engaged in the Standards of Mathematical Practice.
á Resources from professional organizations (e.g., NCTM, MAA, MSRD) must be identified explicitly. At least one resource from a professional organization is required in each lesson. Include complete bibliographical information on all sources.
á Explicitly identify relevant research addressed in the lesson plan reflection component of the lesson plan template (e.g., UDL, multiple intelligences).
á Effective lessons will demonstrate your ability to vary your instructional role (e.g., coach, facilitator).
á In the Reflection on the Class Time section of the lesson plan, include the following:
o A description and an analysis of the event of the lesson
o Representative sample of student work
o Student performance data and analysis
á Reflection on Mentor or collaborating teacher feedback should be included in the Reflection on the Class Time and/or Reflection on What You Would Do Same or Differently Next Time sections of each lesson plan.
Process
Each enacted
lesson is taught during the Phase II internship.
1. Plan the lesson in collaboration with your mentor teacher and supervisor as needed.
2. Enact the lesson; collect student work samples.
3. Analyze student data and work samples.
4. Reflect on the enacted lesson.
5. Upload final lesson plan to TK-20 Portfolio with all Reflection sections completed (as described in the Requirements section). Each enacted lesson has its own tab in the TK-20 Portfolio.
Rubric
Criterion |
Limited (1) |
Developing (2) |
Proficient (3) |
Exemplary (4) |
2a) Use problem solving to develop conceptual
understanding, make sense of a wide variety of problems and persevere in
solving them, apply and adapt a variety of strategies in solving problems
confronted within the field of mathematics and other contexts, and formulate
and test conjectures in order to frame generalizations. |
Lesson does not clearly engage students in
problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide
variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a
variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of
mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to
frame generalizations. |
Lesson inconsistently engages students in
problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide
variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a
variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of
mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to
frame generalizations. |
Lesson consistently engages students in
problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide
variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a
variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of
mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to
frame generalizations. |
Problem solving for
develop conceptual understanding, for making sense of a wide variety of
problems and persevering in solving them, for applying and adapting a variety
of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics
and other contexts, and for formulating and testing conjectures to frame
generalizations is abundantly evident. |
2b.1) The teacher develops and implements supports
for literacy development across content areas and for utilizing appropriate mathematical
vocabulary and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to others. |
Development and implementation supports for literacy development
across content areas and for utilizing appropriate mathematical vocabulary
and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to others is not evident. |
Development and implementation supports for literacy development
across content areas and for utilizing appropriate mathematical vocabulary
and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to others is somewhat evident. |
Development and implementation supports for literacy development
across content areas and for utilizing appropriate mathematical vocabulary
and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to others is sufficiently evident. |
Development and implementation supports for literacy development
across content areas and for utilizing appropriate mathematical vocabulary
and symbols to communicate mathematical ideas to others is abundantly evident. |
2b.2) The teacher engages learners in abstract,
quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is not evident. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is somewhat evident. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is sufficiently evident. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is abundantly evident. |
2b.3) The teacher facilitates
learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique
the reasoning of others. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and
critique the reasoning of others are
not evident. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and
critique the reasoning of others are
somewhat evident. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and
critique the reasoning of others are
sufficiently evident. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and
critique the reasoning of others are
abundantly evident. |
2b.4) The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to
represent and model generalizations using mathematics, to recognize
structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are not evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are somewhat evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are sufficiently evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are abundantly evident. |
2b.5) The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to
use multiple representations to model and describe mathematics. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and
describe mathematics are not evident. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and
describe mathematics are somewhat
evident. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and
describe mathematics are sufficiently
evident. |
Plans to
facilitate learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and
describe mathematics are abundantly
evident. |
2c) Formulate, represent,
analyze, and interpret mathematical models derived from real-world contexts
or mathematical problems. |
The formulation, representation, analysis,
and interpretation of mathematical models derived from real-world contexts or
mathematical problems are not evident
or are minimally evident. |
The formulation, representation, analysis,
and interpretation of mathematical models derived from real-world contexts or
mathematical problems are somewhat
evident. |
The formulation, representation, analysis,
and interpretation of mathematical models derived from real-world contexts or
mathematical problems are sufficiently
evident. |
The formulation, representation, analysis,
and interpretation of mathematical models derived from real-world contexts or
mathematical problems are abundantly
evident. |
2d) Organize
mathematical thinking and use the language of mathematics to express ideas
precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences. |
The organization of mathematical thinking and use of
the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in
writing to multiple audiences is not
evident. |
The organization of mathematical thinking and use of
the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in
writing to multiple audiences is
somewhat evident. |
The organization of mathematical thinking and use of
the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in
writing to multiple audiences is
sufficiently evident. |
The organization of mathematical thinking and use of
the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both orally and in
writing to multiple audiences is
abundantly evident. |
2e.1) Demonstrate
the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one
another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical
ideas. |
Few mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas. |
Some mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas. |
Sufficient mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas. |
In-Depth mathematical connections are made among mathematical ideas. |
2e.2) Demonstrate
the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one
another and recognize and apply mathematical connections across various
content areas and real-world contexts. |
Few mathematical connections are made across various content areas and
real-world contexts. |
Some mathematical connections are made across various content areas and real-world
contexts. |
Sufficient mathematical connections are made across various content areas and
real-world contexts. |
In-Depth mathematical connections are made across various content areas and
real-world contexts. |
2f) Model how the
development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical
domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving,
reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing. |
Modeling how the development of mathematical
understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the
mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is not
evident. |
Modeling how the development of mathematical
understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the
mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is
somewhat evident. |
Modeling how the development of mathematical
understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the
mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is
sufficiently evident. |
Modeling how the development of mathematical
understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects with the
mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is
abundantly evident. |
3a) Apply
knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their
relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains. |
The application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is not evident or is minimally evident. |
The application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is somewhat evident. |
The application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is sufficiently evident. |
The application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is abundantly evident. |
3b) Analyze and
consider research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical
learning experiences. |
The application of research in planning for and leading
students in rich mathematical learning experiences is not evident. |
The application of research in planning for and leading
students in rich mathematical learning experiences is somewhat evident. |
The application of research in planning for and leading
students in rich mathematical learning experiences is sufficiently evident. |
The application of research in planning for and leading
students in rich mathematical learning experiences is abundantly evident. |
3c.1) Plan
lessons that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction
for diverse populations. |
Lessons contain little
to no strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
Lessons contain some
strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
Lessons contain sufficient
strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
Lessons contain an
abundance of strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
3c.2) Plan
lessons that incorporate mathematics-specific and instructional technologies
in building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural
proficiency. |
Lessons incorporate little to no mathematics-specific and instructional technologies,
or the technologies are not targeted for building all studentsÕ
conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Lessons incorporate some mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ
conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Lessons incorporate sufficient mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ
conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Lessons incorporate an abundance of mathematics-specific and instructional
technologies targeted for building
all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
3d) Provide
students with opportunities to communicate about mathematics and make
connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the
workplace. |
Opportunities for students to communicate about
mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas,
everyday life, and the workplace are
not evident. |
Opportunities for students to communicate about
mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas,
everyday life, and the workplace are
somewhat evident. |
Opportunities for students to communicate about
mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas,
everyday life, and the workplace are
sufficiently evident. |
Opportunities for students to communicate about
mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content areas,
everyday life, and the workplace are
abundantly evident. |
3e) Implement
techniques related to student engagement and communication including
selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying
key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions,
and employing a range of questioning strategies. |
Implementation of techniques related to student
engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding
mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and
addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning
strategies is not evident. |
Implementation of techniques related to student
engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding
mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and
addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning
strategies is somewhat evident. |
Implementation of techniques related to student
engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding
mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and
addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning
strategies is sufficiently evident. |
Implementation of techniques related to student
engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks, guiding
mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas, identifying and
addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of questioning
strategies is abundantly evident. |
4a.1) Exhibit
knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and
behavior is not evident. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and
behavior is somewhat evident. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and
behavior is sufficiently evident. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and
behavior is abundantly evident. |
4a.2) Demonstrate
a positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and
learning is not evident. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and
learning is somewhat evident. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and
learning is sufficiently evident. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical processes and
learning is abundantly evident. |
4b) Plan and
create developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning
opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students
are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and
experiences. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is not evident. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is somewhat evident. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is sufficiently evident. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is abundantly evident. |
4c) Incorporate
knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity
that exists within classrooms and include culturally relevant perspectives as
a means to motivate and engage students. |
The incorporation of knowledge of individual
differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within
classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to
motivate and engage students is not
evident. |
The incorporation of knowledge of individual
differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within
classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to
motivate and engage students is
somewhat evident. |
The incorporation of knowledge of individual
differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists within
classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to
motivate and engage students is
sufficiently evident. |
The incorporation of knowledge of individual differences
and the cultural and language diversity that exists within classrooms and
inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a means to motivate and
engage students is abundantly evident. |
4d) Demonstrate
equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of and high
expectations for all students is not
evident. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of and high
expectations for all students is
somewhat evident. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of and high
expectations for all students is
sufficiently evident. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of and high
expectations for all students is
abundantly evident. |
4e.1) Apply
mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional
tools such as manipulatives and physical models,
drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and
mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry
software, computer algebra systems, and statistical packages). |
The application of mathematical content and pedagogical
knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives
and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets,
presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is not evident. |
The application of mathematical content and pedagogical
knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives
and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets,
presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is somewhat evident. |
The application of mathematical content and pedagogical
knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives
and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets,
presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is sufficiently evident. |
The application of mathematical content and pedagogical
knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as manipulatives
and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets,
presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is abundantly evident. |
4e.2) Make sound
decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives
and physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets,
presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing
tools, interactive geometry software, computer algebra systems, and
statistical packages) enhance teaching and learning, recognizing both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools. |
Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is not evident. |
Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is somewhat evident. |
Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is sufficiently evident. |
Sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is abundantly evident. |
5a.1) Verify that secondary students demonstrate conceptual
understanding within major
mathematical domains. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate conceptual understanding within major mathematical domains is not evident or is minimally evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate conceptual understanding within major mathematical domains is somewhat evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate conceptual understanding within major mathematical domains is sufficiently evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate conceptual understanding within major mathematical domains is abundantly evident. |
5a.2) Verify that secondary students demonstrate procedural fluency within
major mathematical domains. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate procedural fluency within major mathematical domains is not evident or is minimally evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate procedural fluency within major mathematical domains is somewhat evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate procedural fluency within major mathematical domains is sufficiently evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate procedural fluency within major mathematical domains is abundantly evident. |
5a.3) Verify that secondary students demonstrate the ability to formulate,
represent, and solve problems within major mathematical domains. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems within
major mathematical domains is not
evident or is minimally evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems within
major mathematical domains is somewhat
evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems within
major mathematical domains is
sufficiently evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems within
major mathematical domains is
abundantly evident. |
5a.4) Verify that secondary students demonstrate productive disposition
toward mathematics within major
mathematical domains. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate productive disposition toward mathematics within major
mathematical domains is not evident or
is minimally evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate productive disposition toward mathematics within major
mathematical domains is somewhat
evident. |
Verification that secondary students demonstrate
productive disposition toward mathematics within major mathematical domains is sufficiently evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate productive disposition toward mathematics within major
mathematical domains is abundantly
evident. |
5a.5) Verify that secondary students demonstrate the application of
mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts within
major mathematical domains is not
evident or is minimally evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts within
major mathematical domains is somewhat
evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts within
major mathematical domains is
sufficiently evident. |
Verification that secondary students
demonstrate the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts within
major mathematical domains is
abundantly evident. |
5b) Engage students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and include mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge. |
The engagement of students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge is not evident. |
The engagement of students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge is somewhat evident. |
The engagement of students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge is sufficiently evident. |
The engagement of students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge is abundantly evident. |
6c) Utilize
resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as
print, digital, and virtual resources/collections. |
The use of resources from professional mathematics
education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual
resources/collections is not evident. |
The use of resources from professional mathematics
education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual
resources/collections is somewhat
evident. |
The use of resources from professional mathematics
education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual
resources/collections is sufficiently
evident. |
The use of resources from professional mathematics education
organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections is abundantly evident. |
7c.1) Demonstrate knowledge, skills, and professional behaviors at both
middle and high school settings. |
The demonstration of knowledge, skills, and
professional behaviors is not evident or is minimally evident. |
The demonstration of knowledge, skills, and
professional behaviors is somewhat evident. |
The demonstration of knowledge, skills, and
professional behaviors is sufficiently evident. |
The demonstration of knowledge, skills, and
professional behaviors is abundantly evident. |
7c.2) Examine the nature of mathematics, how mathematics should be taught,
and how students learn mathematics. |
Examination of the nature of mathematics, how
mathematics should be taught, and how students learn mathematics is not evident or is
minimally evident. |
Examination of the nature of mathematics, how
mathematics should be taught, and how students learn mathematics is somewhat evident. |
Examination of the nature of mathematics, how
mathematics should be taught, and how students learn mathematics is sufficiently evident. |
Examination of the nature of mathematics, how mathematics
should be taught, and how students learn mathematics is abundantly evident. |
7c.3) Observe and analyze a range of approaches to mathematics teaching and
learning, focusing on tasks, discourse, environment, and assessment. |
The observation and analysis of a range of
approaches to mathematics teaching and learning, focusing on tasks,
discourse, environment, and assessment is not evident or is minimally evident. |
The observation and analysis of a range of
approaches to mathematics teaching and learning, focusing on tasks,
discourse, environment, and assessment is somewhat evident. |
The observation and analysis of a range of
approaches to mathematics teaching and learning, focusing on tasks,
discourse, environment, and assessment is sufficiently evident. |
The observation and analysis of a range of
approaches to mathematics teaching and learning, focusing on tasks,
discourse, environment, and assessment is abundantly evident. |
Connections to other assessments
1. EDUC 412/602: Praxis II Principles of Learning and Teaching (7-12) Test Analysis and Reflection
2. EDUC 426/628 and Internship: Curriculum Unit Plan
3. EDUC 426/628: Philosophy of Teaching
4. Internship: Clinical Performance Practice Assessment (CPPA)
5. Praxis II Principles of Learning and Teaching (7-12)
Graders
Mathematics Program Coordinator
Additional Resources
1. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
2. Multiple
Intelligences: http://howardgardner.com/multiple-intelligences/
3. Assessment:
http://www.amle.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx
4. Cooperative
Learning: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/research/highlights/coop-learning/
5. Fostering
Higher Order Thinking in Authentic Contexts: http://www.leadered.com/rrr.html
6. Universal
Design for Learning: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html
7. Task
Rotation: http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/110129.aspx
8. Inquiry
Based Learning: http://www.teachinquiry.com/index/Introduction.html
9. Scaffolding:
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessons-six-strategies-rebecca-alber
10. Think-Pair-Share:
http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/interactive/tpshare.html
11. Frayer Models: http://www.readingeducator.com/strategies/frayer.htm
12. K-W-L:
http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/printouts/chart-a-30226.html
13. Gallery
Walks: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/gallerywalk/index.html
14. Chunking:
http://www.skillstoolbox.com/career-and-education-skills/learning-skills/effective-learning-strategies/chunking/
References
Hiebert,
J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching
on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
(pp. 371-404). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Full
text available at http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/sites/default/files/Hiebert_Grouws.pdf
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10, 9-15. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ333816
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26. Full text available at http://www.grahamtall.co.uk/skemp/pdfs/instrumental-relational.pdf