Overview
The Unit Plan Key Assessment requires teacher candidates to plan and develop a set of lessons around a particular topic (a unit, approximately 500 minutes of instruction), support materials, and assessments. This unit of instruction must be developed in consultation with the mentor teacher and taught during the internÕs full time teaching portion of the phase 2 internship.
An overall grade of “Proficient” is required to progress from
Phase 1.
Purpose
Teaching involves more than just developing individual, stand-alone lessons. A teacher must be able to develop coherent lessons organized around a central theme to support student understanding of concepts, procedures, and relationships. To accomplish this task, a teacher must be able to develop lessons that are interconnected across extended periods of time. The Unit Plan Key Assessment provides teacher candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their ability to plan a coherent unit of instruction.
Connections to Standards
National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2012 Elements |
Unit Plan
Component |
2a) Use problem
solving to develop conceptual understanding, make sense of a wide variety of
problems and persevere in solving them, apply and adapt a variety of
strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and
other contexts, and formulate and test conjectures in order to frame
generalizations. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
2b) Reason
abstractly, reflectively, and quantitatively with attention to units,
constructing viable arguments and proofs, and critiquing the reasoning of
others; represent and model generalizations using mathematics; recognize
structure and express regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning; use
multiple representations to model and describe mathematics; and utilize
appropriate mathematical vocabulary and symbols to communicate mathematical
ideas to others. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
2d) Organize
mathematical thinking and use the language of mathematics to express ideas
precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
2e) Demonstrate
the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one
another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical
ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts. |
•
Unit
Plan Description Alignment Chart •
Individual
Lesson Plans |
2f) Model how
the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical
domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving,
reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
3a) Apply
knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their
relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains. |
•
Alignment Chart |
3b) Analyze and
consider research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical
learning experiences. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
3c) Plan
lessons and units that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated
instruction for diverse populations, and mathematics-specific and
instructional technologies in building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding
and procedural proficiency. |
•
Unit Plan Description •
Individual
Lesson Plans |
3d) Provide
students with opportunities to communicate about mathematics and make
connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the
workplace. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
3e) Implement
techniques related to student engagement and communication including
selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying
key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions,
and employing a range of questioning strategies. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
3f) Plan,
select, implement, interpret, and use formative and summative assessments to
inform instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for
all students. |
•
Assessment Plan |
3g) Monitor
studentsÕ progress, make instructional decisions, and measure studentsÕ
mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative
assessments. |
•
Assessment Plan |
4a) Exhibit
knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior and demonstrate a
positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans •
Assessment Plan |
4b) Plan and
create developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning
opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students
are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and
experiences. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
4c) Incorporate
knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity
that exists within classrooms and include culturally relevant perspectives as
a means to motivate and engage students. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
4d) Demonstrate
equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
4e) Apply
mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use
instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings,
virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and
mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry
software, computer algebra systems, and statistical packages); and make sound
decisions about when such tools enhance teaching and learning, recognizing
both the insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
5a) Verify that
secondary students demonstrate conceptual understanding; procedural fluency;
the ability to formulate, represent, and solve problems; logical reasoning
and continuous reflection on that reasoning; productive disposition toward
mathematics; and the application of mathematics in a variety of contexts
within major mathematical domains. |
•
Assessment Plan |
5b) Engage students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and include mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge. |
•
Individual
Lesson Plans |
5c) Collect, organize, analyze, and
reflect on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and
determine the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have
increased as a result of their instruction. |
•
Assessment Plan |
6c) Utilize
resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as
print, digital, and virtual resources/collections. |
•
Individual Lesson Plans |
Requirements
The curriculum project needs to include the following components:
I. Cover Page
• Includes driving question or title, intended grade level(s), content area, your name (s) and date.
II.
Description of Unit
1. Overall Rationale
• A written statement (about 1 page) in which you summarize your philosophy of mathematics teaching and how it influences the unit you are developing.
• A description of an essential or driving question and how it serves as the focus of the unit.
2. Curriculum Alignment Chart (Concept Map or Outline)
• A table/chart(or other appropriate mechanism) showing the connection among Lessons, Content standard(s), and Summative Assessment Item(s).
III. Assessment Plan
• A pre-assessment to determine the baseline knowledge of students. This assessment should be the same as the summative assessment.
• A formative assessment plan to identify how students are progressing toward lesson/unit objectives during the unit (e.g., observation, homework, classwork)
• A summative assessment to determine the impact of the unit on student learning.
v Assessment items need to be aligned to the unitÕs curriculum goals.
v Assessment items must include higher order thinking (e.g., Levels 4-6 of BloomÕs).
IV. Daily
Lesson Plans
• Lesson plans for 500 minutes of instruction should be fully developed and "classroom-ready." The lesson plans must use the official UMBC Secondary Program Mathematics Lesson Plan template.
• Support Materials (such as copies of handouts, worksheets, journal pages, overheads, etc.) should be embedded in the lesson plans to which they are connected.
• Physical and/or technology tools are required in each lesson. Both physical and technological tools are required at some point in the unit. A rationale for each tool should be included in the lesson plan reflection component of the lesson plan template.
• By the end of the unit, all eight standards of mathematical practice must be addressed at least once. The lesson plan should make explicit how students will be engaged in the practices.
• Identify resources from professional organizations explicitly (e.g., NCTM, MAA, MSRD). At least one resource from a professional organization is required.
• Identify relevant research addressed in the lesson plan reflection component of the lesson plan template (e.g., UDL, multiple intelligences).
• Although direct instruction and the ÒI Do-We Do-You DoÓ method may be appropriate occasionally, such methods should not be the foundation of your unit because they generally do not deeply engage students in the mathematical practice standards. Your lesson plans should demonstrate your ability to vary your instructional role (e.g., coach, facilitator).
• Include complete bibliographical information on all sources
V. Calendar
• Include a calendar with dates for activities, investigations and artifact production. Since you are not teaching the unit this term, the dates will probably be hypothetical, but the purpose of this requirement is to convert your brainstormed project into an ordered timeline, taking into account weekends, holidays, etc.
Process
The curriculum project is constructed throughout the fall semester in collaboration with your mentor teacher. You are required to have your mentor review and Òsign offÓ during multiple checkpoints of the project construction. These checkpoints include:
1. Identification of content standards to be addressed. The content should address standards that you will be teaching during phase 2 (generally during Feb and/or March).
2. Development of appropriate Pre/Post assessments
3. Outline of curriculum unit lessons
4. Development of one completed lesson plan
The curriculum project is due during finals week of the fall semester.
Rubric link
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2012 Indicator |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
The
Unit as a Whole |
||||
2e.1)
Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build
on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among
mathematical ideas. |
Few
mathematical connections are made
among mathematical ideas. |
Some
mathematical connections are made
among mathematical ideas. |
Sufficient mathematical connections are made among
mathematical ideas. |
In-Depth mathematical connections are made among
mathematical ideas. |
2e.2)
Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build
on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections across
various content areas and real-world contexts. |
Few mathematical connections are made across various content
areas and real-world contexts. |
Some
mathematical connections are made
across various content areas and real-world contexts. |
Sufficient mathematical connections are made across various
content areas and real-world contexts. |
In-Depth mathematical connections are made across various
content areas and real-world contexts. |
3c.1) Plan
units that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction
for diverse populations. |
The unit contains little to no strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
The unit contains some strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
The unit contains sufficient strategy variation and differentiated instruction. |
The unit contains an abundance of strategy variation and differentiated
instruction. |
3c.2) Plan units
that incorporate mathematics-specific and instructional technologies in
building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural proficiency. |
The unit incorporates little to no mathematics-specific and instructional technologies,
or the technologies are not targeted for building all studentsÕ
conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
The unit incorporates some mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ
conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
The unit incorporates sufficient mathematics-specific and instructional technologies targeted for building all studentsÕ
conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
The unit incorporates an abundance of mathematics-specific and instructional
technologies targeted for building
all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Length of Unit |
The unit plans for significantly more or
less than 500 minutes of instruction, timing estimates for individual lessons
are not consistently included, or timing estimates are not reasonable. |
The unit plans for approximately 500
minutes of instruction, but timing estimates are sometimes over-
or under-estimated. |
The unit plans for approximately 500
minutes of instruction, and timing estimates are reasonable. |
The unit plans for approximately 500
minutes of instruction, and timing estimates are reasonable, and timing
adjustments for under- and over-achieving students are included. |
Curriculum Alignment Chart |
|
|
|
|
2e.3)
Demonstrate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build
on one another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among
mathematical ideas. |
Few
mathematical connections are made
among mathematical ideas. |
Some
mathematical connections are made
among mathematical ideas. |
Sufficient mathematical connections are made among
mathematical ideas. |
In-Depth mathematical connections are made among
mathematical ideas. |
3a) Apply
knowledge of curriculum standards for secondary mathematics and their
relationship to student learning within and across mathematical domains. |
Application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is not evident. |
Application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is somewhat evident. |
Application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is sufficiently evident. |
Application of knowledge of curriculum
standards for secondary mathematics and their relationship to student
learning within and across mathematical domains is abundantly evident. |
Assessment Plan |
||||
3f.1) Plan,
select, implement, interpret, and use formative assessments to inform
instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all
students. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is not evident. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is somewhat evident. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is sufficiently evident. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of formative assessments to inform instruction by reflecting
on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is abundantly evident. |
3f.2) Plan,
select, implement, interpret, and use summative assessments to inform
instruction by reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all
students. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is not evident. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is somewhat evident. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is sufficiently evident. |
The planning, selecting, implementing,
interpreting, and using of summative assessments to inform instruction by
reflecting on mathematical proficiencies essential for all students is abundantly evident. |
3g) Monitor
studentsÕ progress, make instructional decisions, and measure studentsÕ
mathematical understanding and ability using formative and summative
assessments. |
The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making
instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding
and ability using formative and summative assessments is not evident. |
The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making
instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding
and ability using formative and summative assessments is somewhat evident. |
The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making
instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding
and ability using formative and summative assessments is sufficiently evident. |
The monitoring of studentsÕ progress, making
instructional decisions, and measuring studentsÕ mathematical understanding
and ability using formative and summative assessments is abundantly evident. |
5a.1)
The teacher verifies that secondary students demonstrate conceptual
understanding and procedural fluency. |
Verification of both conceptual
understanding and procedural fluency is
not evident. |
Verification of both conceptual
understanding and procedural fluency is
somewhat evident. |
Verification of both conceptual
understanding and procedural fluency is
sufficiently evident. |
Verification of both conceptual
understanding and procedural fluency is
abundantly evident. |
5a.2)
The teacher verifies that secondary students demonstrate the ability to
formulate, represent, and solve problems. |
Verification of the ability to formulate,
represent, and solve problems is not
evident. |
Verification of the ability to formulate,
represent, and solve problems is somewhat
evident. |
Verification of the ability to formulate,
represent, and solve problems is sufficiently
evident. |
Verification of have the ability to
formulate, represent, and solve problems is
abundantly evident. |
5a.3)
The teacher verifies that secondary students demonstrate logical reasoning
and continuous reflection on that reasoning. |
Verification of logical reasoning and
continuous reflection on that reasoning is
not evident. |
Verification of logical reasoning and
continuous reflection on that reasoning is
somewhat evident. |
Verification of logical reasoning and
continuous reflection on that reasoning is
sufficiently evident. |
Verification of logical reasoning and
continuous reflection on that reasoning is
abundantly evident. |
5a.4)
The teacher verifies that secondary students apply mathematics in a variety
of contexts within major mathematical domains. |
Verification that secondary students apply
mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is not evident. |
Verification that secondary students apply
mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is somewhat evident. |
Verification that secondary students apply
mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is sufficiently evident. |
Verification that secondary students apply
mathematics in a variety of contexts within major mathematical domains is abundantly evident. |
5c) Collect, organize, analyze, and
reflect on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and
determine the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have
increased as a result of their instruction. |
Plan for collecting,
organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on
diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment evidence and determining the
extent to which studentsÕ mathematical proficiencies have increased as a
result of their instruction is not
evident. |
Plan for
collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment
evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical
proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is somewhat evident. |
Plan for
collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment
evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical
proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is sufficiently evident. |
Plan for
collecting, organizing, analyzing, and reflecting on diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment
evidence and determining the extent to which studentsÕ mathematical
proficiencies have increased as a result of their instruction is abundantly evident. |
Daily
Lesson Plans |
||||
Format of Lesson Plans |
The lessons are presented in the
Secondary Program Lesson Plan Template, but a significant amount of
information in the template is missing or unclear. |
The lessons are presented in the Secondary
Program Lesson Plan Template, but some information in the template is missing
or unclear. |
The lessons are presented in the
Secondary Program Lesson Plan Template, and all information in the template
is included. |
The lessons are presented in the Secondary
Program Lesson Plan Template, all information in the template is included,
and all information is clear, sufficiently detailed yet succinct, and well-organized. |
2a) Use problem
solving to develop conceptual understanding, make sense of a wide variety of
problems and persevere in solving them, apply and adapt a variety of
strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and
other contexts, and formulate and test conjectures in order to frame
generalizations. |
Lesson plans do not clearly engage students in
problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide
variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a
variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of
mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to
frame generalizations. |
Lesson plans inconsistently engage students in
problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide
variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a
variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of
mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to
frame generalizations. |
Lesson plans consistently engage students in
problem solving to develop conceptual understanding, to make sense of a wide
variety of problems and persevere in solving them, to apply and adapt a
variety of strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of
mathematics and other contexts, and to formulate and test conjectures to
frame generalizations. |
Problem solving for develop
conceptual understanding, for making sense of a wide variety of problems and
persevering in solving them, for applying and adapting a variety of
strategies in solving problems confronted within the field of mathematics and
other contexts, and for formulating and testing conjectures to frame
generalizations is an integral part of
all lesson plans. |
2b.1)
The teacher engages learners in abstract, quantitative, and reflective
reasoning with attention to units. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is not evident. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is somewhat evident. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is sufficiently evident. |
Engagement of learners in
abstract, quantitative, and reflective reasoning with attention to units is abundantly evident. |
2b.2)
The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to construct
viable arguments and proofs and critique the reasoning of others. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the
reasoning of others are not evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the
reasoning of others are somewhat
evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the
reasoning of others are sufficiently
evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to construct viable arguments and proofs and critique the
reasoning of others are abundantly
evident. |
2b.3)
The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to represent and model
generalizations using mathematics, to recognize structure, and to express
regularity in patterns of mathematical reasoning. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are not evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are somewhat evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are sufficiently evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to represent and model generalizations using mathematics,
to recognize structure, and to express regularity in patterns of mathematical
reasoning are abundantly evident. |
2b.4)
The teacher facilitates learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to
model and describe mathematics. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe
mathematics are not evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe
mathematics are somewhat evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe
mathematics are sufficiently evident. |
Plans to facilitate
learnersÕ ability to use multiple representations to model and describe
mathematics are abundantly evident. |
2d) Organize
mathematical thinking and use the language of mathematics to express ideas
precisely, both orally and in writing to multiple audiences. |
The organization of mathematical thinking
and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both
orally and in writing to multiple audiences is not evident. |
The organization of mathematical thinking
and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both
orally and in writing to multiple audiences is somewhat evident. |
The organization of mathematical thinking
and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both
orally and in writing to multiple audiences is sufficiently evident. |
The organization of mathematical thinking
and use of the language of mathematics to express ideas precisely, both
orally and in writing to multiple audiences is abundantly evident. |
2e) Demonstrate
the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one
another and recognize and apply mathematical connections among mathematical
ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts. |
The demonstration of the
interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another
and recognition and application of mathematical connections among
mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is not evident. |
The demonstration of the
interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another
and recognition and application of mathematical connections among
mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is somewhat evident. |
The demonstration of the
interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another
and recognition and application of mathematical connections among
mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is sufficiently evident. |
The demonstration of the
interconnectedness of mathematical ideas and how they build on one another
and recognition and application of mathematical connections among
mathematical ideas and across various content areas and real-world contexts is abundantly evident. |
2f) Model how
the development of mathematical understanding within and among mathematical
domains intersects with the mathematical practices of problem solving,
reasoning, communicating, connecting, and representing. |
Modeling how the development of
mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects
with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is not
evident. |
Modeling how the development of
mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects
with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is somewhat
evident. |
Modeling how the development of
mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects
with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is sufficiently
evident. |
Modeling how the development of
mathematical understanding within and among mathematical domains intersects
with the mathematical practices of problem solving, reasoning, communicating,
connecting, and representing is abundantly
evident. |
3b) Analyze and
consider research in planning for and leading students in rich mathematical
learning experiences. |
The application of research in planning
for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the
unit is not evident. |
The application of research in planning
for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the
unit is somewhat evident. |
The application of research in planning
for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the
unit is sufficiently evident. |
The application of research in planning
for and leading students in rich mathematical learning experiences in the
unit is abundantly evident. |
3c.3) Plan lessons
that incorporate a variety of strategies, differentiated instruction for
diverse populations. |
Individual lessons contain little to no strategy variation and
differentiated instruction. |
Individual lessons contain some strategy variation and
differentiated instruction. |
Individual lessons contain sufficient strategy variation and
differentiated instruction. |
Individual lessons contain an abundance of strategy variation
and differentiated instruction. |
3c.4) Plan lessons
that incorporate mathematics-specific and instructional technologies in
building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural proficiency. |
Individual lessons incorporate little to no mathematics-specific and
instructional technologies, or the technologies are not targeted for
building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Individual lessons incorporate some mathematics-specific and
instructional technologies targeted
for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Individual lessons incorporate sufficient mathematics-specific and
instructional technologies targeted
for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
Individual lessons incorporate an abundance of mathematics-specific
and instructional technologies targeted
for building all studentsÕ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. |
3d) Provide
students with opportunities to communicate about mathematics and make
connections among mathematics, other content areas, everyday life, and the
workplace. |
Opportunities for students to communicate
about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content
areas, everyday life, and the workplace are
not evident. |
Opportunities for students to communicate
about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content
areas, everyday life, and the workplace are
somewhat evident. |
Opportunities for students to communicate
about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content
areas, everyday life, and the workplace are
sufficiently evident. |
Opportunities for students to communicate
about mathematics and make connections among mathematics, other content
areas, everyday life, and the workplace are
abundantly evident. |
3e) Implement
techniques related to student engagement and communication including
selecting high quality tasks, guiding mathematical discussions, identifying
key mathematical ideas, identifying and addressing student misconceptions,
and employing a range of questioning strategies. |
Implementation of techniques related to
student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks,
guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas,
identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of
questioning strategies is not evident. |
Implementation of techniques related to
student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks,
guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas,
identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of
questioning strategies is somewhat
evident. |
Implementation of techniques related to
student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks,
guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas,
identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of
questioning strategies is sufficiently
evident. |
Implementation of techniques related to
student engagement and communication including selecting high quality tasks,
guiding mathematical discussions, identifying key mathematical ideas,
identifying and addressing student misconceptions, and employing a range of
questioning strategies is abundantly
evident. |
4a.1) Exhibit
knowledge of adolescent learning, development, and behavior. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning,
development, and behavior is not
evident. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning,
development, and behavior is somewhat evident. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning,
development, and behavior is
sufficiently evident. |
Knowledge of adolescent learning,
development, and behavior is
abundantly evident. |
4a.2) Demonstrate
a positive disposition toward mathematical processes and learning. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical processes
and learning is not evident. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical
processes and learning is somewhat evident. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical
processes and learning is sufficiently
evident. |
Positive disposition toward mathematical
processes and learning is abundantly evident. |
4b) Plan and
create developmentally appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning
opportunities grounded in mathematics education research in which students
are actively engaged in building new knowledge from prior knowledge and
experiences. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is not evident. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is somewhat evident. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is sufficiently evident. |
The planning and creating of developmentally
appropriate, sequential, and challenging learning opportunities grounded in
mathematics education research in which students are actively engaged in
building new knowledge from prior knowledge and experiences is abundantly evident. |
4c) Incorporate
knowledge of individual differences and the cultural and language diversity
that exists within classrooms and include culturally relevant perspectives as
a means to motivate and engage students. |
The incorporation of knowledge of
individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists
within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a
means to motivate and engage students is
not evident. |
The incorporation of knowledge of
individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists
within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a
means to motivate and engage students is
somewhat evident. |
The incorporation of knowledge of
individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists
within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a
means to motivate and engage students is
sufficiently evident. |
The incorporation of knowledge of
individual differences and the cultural and language diversity that exists
within classrooms and inclusion of culturally relevant perspectives as a
means to motivate and engage students is
abundantly evident. |
4d) Demonstrate
equitable and ethical treatment of and high expectations for all students. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of
and high expectations for all students is
not evident. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of
and high expectations for all students is
somewhat evident. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of
and high expectations for all students is
sufficiently evident. |
The equitable and ethical treatment of
and high expectations for all students is
abundantly evident. |
4e.1) Apply
mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge to select and use
instructional tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings,
virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and
mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools, interactive geometry
software, computer algebra systems, and statistical packages). |
The application of mathematical content
and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as
manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments,
spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is not evident. |
The application of mathematical content
and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as
manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments,
spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is somewhat evident. |
The application of mathematical content
and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as
manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments,
spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is sufficiently evident. |
The application of mathematical content
and pedagogical knowledge to select and use instructional tools such as
manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual environments,
spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific technologies is abundantly evident. |
4e.2) Make
sound decisions about when instructional tools such as manipulatives and
physical models, drawings, virtual environments, spreadsheets, presentation
tools, and mathematics-specific technologies (e.g., graphing tools,
interactive geometry software, computer algebra systems, and statistical
packages) enhance teaching and learning, recognizing both the insights to be
gained and possible limitations of such tools. |
Sound decisions about when instructional
tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is not evident. |
Sound decisions about when instructional
tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is somewhat evident. |
Sound decisions about when instructional
tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is sufficiently evident. |
Sound decisions about when instructional
tools such as manipulatives and physical models, drawings, virtual
environments, spreadsheets, presentation tools, and mathematics-specific
technologies enhance teaching and learning and the recognition of both the
insights to be gained and possible limitations of such tools is abundantly evident. |
5b) Engage students in developmentally
appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that require active
engagement and include mathematics-specific technology in building new
knowledge. |
The engagement of students in
developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that
require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in
building new knowledge is not evident. |
The engagement of students in
developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that
require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in
building new knowledge is somewhat
evident. |
The engagement of students in
developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that
require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in
building new knowledge is sufficiently
evident. |
The engagement of students in
developmentally appropriate mathematical activities and investigations that
require active engagement and inclusion of mathematics-specific technology in
building new knowledge is abundantly
evident. |
6c) Utilize
resources from professional mathematics education organizations such as
print, digital, and virtual resources/collections. |
The use of resources from professional
mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual
resources/collections is not evident. |
The use of resources from professional
mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual
resources/collections is somewhat
evident. |
The use of resources from professional
mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual resources/collections
is sufficiently evident. |
The use of resources from professional
mathematics education organizations such as print, digital, and virtual
resources/collections is abundantly
evident. |
Connections to other assessments
1. EDUC 412: Lesson plan adaptation and Reflection
2. EDUC 426: Focus Lessons
3. EDUC 426: Content Expertise
4. EDUC 457: Effect on student learning – Teachingfolio
5. EDUC 457: Enacted lessons – Teaching folio
Grader(s)
Course Instructor
Additional Resources
1. Official Lesson plan template: https://www.box.com/s/rwmomb5gbcthminxtvv0
2. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: http://www.corestandards.org/Math
3. Maryland Common Core Framework for Mathematics: http://mdk12.org/instruction/curriculum/mathematics/index.html
4. Maryland State Department of Education Curriculum Management System Resources: https://msde.blackboard.com/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_219_1
5. Tools for the Common Core for Mathematics: http://commoncoretools.me/tools/
6. Multiple Intelligences: http://howardgardner.com/multiple-intelligences/
7. Assessment: http://www.amle.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx
8. Cooperative Learning: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/research/highlights/coop-learning/
9. Fostering Higher Order Thinking in Authentic Contexts: http://www.leadered.com/rrr.html
10. Universal Design for Learning: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html
11. Task Rotation: http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/110129.aspx
12. Inquiry Based Learning: http://www.teachinquiry.com/index/Introduction.html
13. Scaffolding: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessons-six-strategies-rebecca-alber
14. Think-Pair-Share: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/interactive/tpshare.html
15. Frayer Models: http://www.readingeducator.com/strategies/frayer.htm
16. K-W-L: http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/printouts/chart-a-30226.html
17. Gallery Walks: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/gallerywalk/index.html
18. Chunking: http://www.skillstoolbox.com/career-and-education-skills/learning-skills/effective-learning-strategies/chunking/